How does firing thousands of federal workers – WITHOUT EVIDENCE – (and with much evidence to positive performance reviews) – serve the American citizen?
Yep, I get it. I want to cut the deficit too. The $400 hammers and the $120 coffee cups is certainly ridiculous – I would hope that we would all agree on that.
However, simply dismissing people – many of whom have dedicated their careers to PUBLIC SERVICE – for no reason is a tragedy and it is the Republican Party who is allowing this to happen.
Being FIRED for no apparent reason demands a reasonable explanation.
Which Republican PATRIOT will be the first to stand up to this tyranny?
Or perhaps a better question would be…
CONGRESS REPUBLICANS:
Specify five things you have done in the past week for the American citizens who elected you (or we will consider your non-response as your resignation):
]]>
Thanks Lawrence O’Donnell with Creations and Creativity
]]>Thanks to Jessica Denson
]]>…
“The only candidates on Nevada’s (presidential preference primary) ballot are those who filed with the Nevada’s Secretary of State’s office to run for president in this election,” a Clark County press release read, according to the Nevada Current. “If a candidate did not file with the Nevada SOS’s office to run in this election, then that candidate’s name cannot appear on the ballot.”
…
Even though Trump CHOSE to not be on the primary ballot in Nevada, we are sure that if his presidential run starts to fail he and his MAGA die hards will find a way to blame “radical left” Democrats or the “deep state.”
…
]]>The questions at the heart of the appeal are untested long shots largely because of Trump’s unprecedented efforts to reverse his loss in the 2020 election. They are: does presidential immunity prevent prosecution for crimes committed while in office? And, can former presidents be prosecuted over acts that, during a Senate impeachment trial, resulted in their acquittal?
…
Smith had argued to the Supreme Court that allowing the appeal to move along its normal course would likely delay the trial, saying that it was of “imperative public importance” to resolve the case.
“The United States recognizes that this is an extraordinary request,” he wrote. “This is an extraordinary case.”
Trump shot back this week that Smith had no standing to ask for the sped up appeal because he had won at the district level, and peppered the special counsel with accusations that the case was only urgent for “partisan” political reasons.
…
Eleven-22 commentary: Trump is GUILTY, he has shown ZERO EVIDENCE of innocence, and he is not worthy of any political office – ever.
…
]]>